Saturday, November 29, 2025
Pretendian crisis
Saturday, November 15, 2025
Corporate magnates trying to repackage the human….
From my comic What Is The Source of Insane Ideas?, published as a standalone project in 1991 (under the pen name Seekorum), and then incorporated into my illustrated mega novel manuscript Plastic Millennium.
In this scene, Prof. Walt Whitman meets with corporate magnate Contrat Lindl. Whitman tells Lindl that military fear of nuclear wears has turbocharged research into building a super intelligent computer that has the capacity to monitor and shape human affairs.
Lindl listens to Whitman with thinly concealed impatience, countering that nuclear weapons have succeeded “in keeping the peace” for 45 years. Whitman becomes disconsolate and says fatalistically that the existence of nuclear weapons has taken on a life of its own, and is the primary factor driving research into artificiality (eg., artificial intelligence). Whitman tells Lindl that if humanity is to survive, then it must relinquish nukes.
As soon as Whitman leaves Lindl’s office, Lindl rejoices and walks to a small shrine he’s built to Friedrich Nietzsche. Lindl is in the habit of having feverish monologues with his portrait of Neitzsche. He says the existence of intelligent computers means there now exists on Earth a “Super-Being”, and this implies that it will now be possible for humans to develop an “uber-mensch” — that is, an Overman or Superman who is a technology-driven evolution beyond the human race.
Friday, November 14, 2025
Publishing’s blind spot
Wednesday, November 12, 2025
Witnessing climate change
Monday, November 10, 2025
Friday, November 07, 2025
MoonSong
Friday, October 31, 2025
Happyland 9
Wednesday, October 29, 2025
When the small….
WHEN THE SMALL PEOPLE STAND NEXT TO THE BIG PEOPLE — poetry and the wider world…
#APEC2025 #apec #trump
#leejaemyung #이재명 #경주
Full video at YouTube: WHEN THE SMALL PEOPLE STAND NEXT TO THE BIG PEOPLE: POETRY, GEOPOLITICS, AND CONSEQUENCES
https://youtu.be/1TGEheN5q7Y
Saturday, October 25, 2025
Trump versus the truth
Thursday, October 23, 2025
Does anglophone Canada have a real culture?
Sunday, October 19, 2025
High School 1976
Saturday, October 18, 2025
The short story vs. AI?
Tuesday, October 14, 2025
Sunday, October 12, 2025
The army versus hungry vets
Scented books?
Charles Barnett in The Guardian:
First, a confession: I have not read Jennifer L Armentrout’s latest novel, The Primal of Blood and Bone. Nor have I sniffed it, or licked it. Which might be an odd thing to do, but for the fact that a special edition of the romantasy book has been released with garlic-infused ink.
Armentrout is a hugely-successful “hybrid” author, both self- and traditionally published, and has made the New York Times bestseller list on numerous occasions. She writes in the currently insanely popular romantic fantasy market, and her new novel, the latest in a series, features vampire-analogy monsters called the Craven.
Enter stage right: Hellmann’s, which despite having exactly the sort of name you might find in a romantasy novel, is in fact a purveyor of mayonnaise and other table-top squirty condiments. Hellmann’s has teamed up with Armentrout and her publishers, Blue Box Press, to release a special edition of The Primal of Blood and Bone which is printed with ink mixed with their garlic aioli – the Craven being vampires, remember, and so averse to a bit of garlic.
This is, of course, is an attempt to grab the TikTok generation by the throat. Understandably so: the video-sharing social media platform has become one of the biggest book marketing opportunities for publishers in modern times.
And it is here, dear reader, that I heave a world-weary sigh and reveal myself to be yet another grumpy, middle-aged, largely unknown author waving his fist at the clouds in the style of Grampa Simpson and raging against the dying of the light … or at least, against the shift away from the seemingly outmoded idea of publishers just trying to sell books because, y’know, they’re books, and they’re good.
Just hold off typing that takedown in the comment box for one second and let me explain. Do I sound bitter? Of course I’m bitter. All writers are misanthropic sociopaths at heart. We’re bitter about everything. That’s why we make stuff up all the time, trying to imagine worlds we might not be quite as bitter about as this one.
*
Barnett’s complaint about the cynicism and/or crassness and/or opportunism of the publishing industry is nothing new. It’s a business. However, it is a special kind of cultural business; it carries with it the mystique of a cultural enterprise that is idealistic and shaped by the standards of high culture in the sense that Adorno conceived of it.
Friday, October 10, 2025
More on nursing homes
Tuesday, October 07, 2025
Do nursing homes give enough information?
Saturday, October 04, 2025
High School 1
Friday, October 03, 2025
Truth Marathon, new opening
Thursday, October 02, 2025
Green tea and kimchi
Sunday, September 28, 2025
Saturday, September 27, 2025
Can a novel be a movie?
Can a novel be a movie?
Full video at YouTube: https://youtu.be/PFBVpqfxoKk
Can a novel be a movie?
Tuesday, September 23, 2025
Wednesday, September 17, 2025
Fascism in America
Sunday, September 14, 2025
Commuting costs
The novel as movie
Saturday, August 30, 2025
Thursday, July 24, 2025
David Helwig’s incel phase
Saturday, July 19, 2025
Must Canadian books have small sales?
Friday, July 18, 2025
PoetryJudge app
PoetryJudge
Thursday, July 10, 2025
Hot, dry
Environmental videos
Thursday, July 03, 2025
Dying pine trees
Wednesday, July 02, 2025
Tuesday, July 01, 2025
What happened to Canadian industry?
Monday, June 30, 2025
Hot, hotter
Friday, June 27, 2025
Who is Kim Jong un?
Monday, June 23, 2025
Thursday, June 19, 2025
Jangma 2
Monday, June 16, 2025
Jangma rains
Sunday, June 15, 2025
Local and global climate change
AI and Warfare
Saturday, June 14, 2025
Sound meditation
Wednesday, June 11, 2025
Monday, June 09, 2025
Insects’ World
INSECTS’ WORLD
(or, Beware of Those With Boots)
The letters
were threatening,
for the systems
had won too much…
We assumed
bad days would pass —.
But instead
everyone was stuffed
in a van.
Insects' World- Baram CXL
https://youtu.be/INoBL09TNtY
Thursday, June 05, 2025
Trump versus Musk
Monday, June 02, 2025
Korean climate and the North and South Poles
Sunday, June 01, 2025
Joni Ernst and medical cutbacks
“We’re all going to die”: Joni Ernst, Medicaid cuts, and care; parallels with Medicare cutbacks in Canada.
#joni_ernst #medicaid #medicare #death #cutbacks #elderlycare
Full video at YouTube:
https://youtube.com/shorts/zjWs-SGdu9Y?feature=share
Friday, May 30, 2025
L’intelligence artificielle
Thursday, May 29, 2025
AI and the publishing industry
The impact of artificial intelligence on publishing houses #publishingindustry #ai
https://youtube.com/shorts/TL_1DD3Joe8?feature=share
Tuesday, May 27, 2025
Wednesday, May 14, 2025
Male brains, female brains and fictional narrative
From 2006, originally published in Litkicks:
Male Brains, Female Brains and Fictional Narrative
By Finn Harvor
September 22, 2006
People aren’t buying literary fiction, we are told. Male readers in particular aren’t buying it. The reasons given these days are sometimes based on what academics call “essentialist” explanations; in other words, these activities — or lack thereof — are the result of genes. Women, we are told in recent articles by Ian McEwan, Boris Johnson and others, are hard-wired to empathize and be interested in relationships. Men are more interested in practical issues and, that catch-all word, “facts”. Or, according to this line of thought, they are not interested in reading at all.
An interesting response to this argument was made recently by Lakshmi Chaudhry of In These Times. Chaudhry begins her piece by criticizing David Brooks of the NYT for stating that boys are reading less than girls because schools are teaching “feminized” books.
Chaudhry’s initial point is that Brooks was indulging in neo-conservative thinking. While allowing that there may be a cognitive — that is, genetic — explanation for different reading patterns among men and women, she emphasizes the importance of social conditioning:
“But in a culture infused with polarizing messages about gender, such small differences can be magnified into vast disparities. If the act of reading novels today seems more “girly” — because of female-dominated book clubs or a publishing industry increasingly geared toward its most loyal customers, i.e., women – then men are less likely to do so.”
In short, Chaudhry wants to emphasize the importance social attitudes play, and ends her article by declaring we “we may be headed back to the 19th century, when the novel was considered a low-status, frivolous pastime of ladies of leisure, unfit for real men.”
It needs underlining that this is not an outcome Chaudhry wishes for; in her piece, she suggests that we need to re-engage male readers, especially at the high school level. And this is true. But in her counter-argument to Brooks’ socio-conservative overgeneralizations, Chaudhry misses a crucial point (and also makes an inaccurate overgeneralization of her own: she claims that during the 19th Century, novels were derided as frivolous and the past-time of “ladies of leisure”. In fact, this was clearly untrue during the Victorian period). Before the mid-20th Century, the novel was narrative form. Or rather, it was narrative in its long, stylistically “real” form. As Michael Allen has pointed out, the novel had no competition as a form of narrative from non-print media. And this cultural milieu in which the printed word was paramount was a major factor in the novel’s success as an artistic medium.
The last sentence is key; for if that point at which culture and technology meet were to remain eternally static, it is unlikely the novel would be in danger, as Chaudhry claims, of losing its prestige as a centerpiece of culture if society became more sexist. And that, of course, is because technology does affect culture. Very much so, where the production of narrative is concerned. As a result, when we think of fiction we should not think of novels versus non-fiction books. We should think of novels and movies and TV shows versus non-fiction. For most of the movies and TV shows that are popular are still fictional in nature; they are made up. And their audiences, one presumes, are both male and female.
This is the mistake of the current debate over the fate of the novel: it does not include all fictional narratives in the same large group. It does not recognize that fiction – when defined to include fiction that exists in all media — is having zero trouble retaining its popularity amongst both sexes.
In short, there is no biological drive on the part of men to avoid fiction. Instead, there may (I repeat, may) be a biological drive on the part of men, generally speaking, to prefer image-based media to certain kinds of print-media. In other words, this drive may have no significant depressive effect on men’s overall amount of reading, but may incline them, as a group, to read factual material that can “compete” with the great temptation of images.
More clinical research will need to be done to understand these nuances between how male and female brains process cultural stimuli. (In fact, more research will need to be done in to the question of just what we mean when we use terms such as “male” and “female” brains.)
And, in the meantime, literary commentators attracted to this issue — which, after all, is not unimportant, since the perception that male and female readers buy different sorts of books is having a tremendous influence on the choices publishers are making these days — might do well to think a little more carefully about what we mean when we use terms like “literary fiction”. After all, literature is ultimately another word for good writing. And good writing exists in mediums outside print.
Saturday, May 10, 2025
Gender and reading
Thursday, May 08, 2025
Cats and food
Saturday, May 03, 2025
Semi feral cats
Semi-feral cats in South Korea
#feralcats #koreannature #시골생활 #시골고양이 #catfood
Full video at YouTube:
https://youtube.com/shorts/9QPz5T_E0uo?feature=share
Wednesday, April 30, 2025
Sunday, April 27, 2025
Traditional markets in Seoul
The Tongin Shijang is a traditional market in central Seoul. Adapting to changing consumer patterns is its biggest challenge.
Market Alive: Tongin Shijang
https://youtu.be/3sPMafkAPX8
Thursday, April 17, 2025
Mark Carney
Who is Mark Carney? (Part one)
#MarkCarney #cdnpoli #canadianelection2025
YouTube:
https://youtu.be/K5zIoHki1Kc
Tuesday, April 15, 2025
New forms of literature?
I recently came across a social media post in which a Canadian author (whose publishing house has a logo emblazoned with the Maple Leaf) was waxing enthusiastically about an American hospital drama on Netflix. Several of her followers — also Canadian, and also patriotically utilizing the Maple Leaf in their IDs — were similarly giddy about the Netflix series. Normally, nothing worth paying attention to about this; it’s common practice in anglophone Canada.
But … but … the threat to Canada’s sovereignty has not magically disappeared, even though the aggression of the threats has moderated somewhat. So what does the future hold? Where Canada’s sovereignty is concerned, nothing pleasant if Canadians don’t change — and in a very radical way — their habits of cultural consumption. English speaking Canada is a highly colonized zone. This leads to the bizarre spectacle of Canadians (like the author mentioned above) spending a lot of time online denouncing American neo-imperialism while simultaneously binge watching US pop culture. And there’s no point in going online oneself and pointing out to these people what they’re doing; emotionally, they’re like teenagers who want “freedom” while demanding an allowance.
So, since people don’t like being told they SHOULD watch or read or listen to certain cultural works (for example, Canadian), this means that the producers of Canadian culture need to think in new ways.
A few years ago, I established a micro press called BridgeText. One of its ideas is that we need more novels that are experienced as movie scripts are.
More here: Toward a New Literature
https://youtu.be/TTux0NcjCHc
And here: https://youtu.be/NALcaQ3QCYs?si=76rj7dAePOZRsZZT
*
Je suis récemment tombé sur une publication sur les réseaux sociaux dans laquelle une auteure canadienne (dont la maison d'édition arbore un logo arborant la feuille d'érable) s'extasiait sur une série américaine sur Netflix, mettant en scène un hôpital. Plusieurs de ses abonnés, eux aussi canadiens et utilisant la feuille d'érable par patriotisme, étaient tout aussi enthousiastes à propos de la série Netflix. Normalement, rien d'intéressant à ce sujet ; c'est une pratique courante au Canada anglophone.
Mais… mais… la menace à la souveraineté du Canada n'a pas disparu comme par magie, même si son agressivité s'est quelque peu atténuée. Alors, que nous réserve l'avenir ? En ce qui concerne la souveraineté du Canada, rien de réjouissant si les Canadiens ne changent pas – et de manière très radicale – leurs habitudes de consommation culturelle. Le Canada anglophone est une zone fortement colonisée. Cela donne lieu à l'étrange spectacle de Canadiens (comme l'auteure mentionnée plus haut) passant beaucoup de temps en ligne à dénoncer le néo-impérialisme américain tout en regardant des séries de culture populaire américaine. Et il est inutile d'aller soi-même en ligne et de montrer à ces gens ce qu'ils font ; Émotionnellement, ils sont comme des adolescents qui aspirent à la « liberté » tout en exigeant une allocation.
Ainsi, comme les gens n'aiment pas qu'on leur dise qu'ils DEVRAIENT regarder, lire ou écouter certaines œuvres culturelles (par exemple, canadiennes), cela signifie que les producteurs de culture canadienne doivent réfléchir différemment.
Il y a quelques années, j'ai fondé une micro-édition appelée BridgeText. L'une de ses idées est que nous avons besoin de plus de romans qui se vivent comme des scénarios de films.
Plus ici : Nouveau futur littéraire?
https://youtu.be/9muSm6LScHE
Sunday, April 13, 2025
Does Canadian culture have a future?
All these people — each and every one — are self perceived Canadian nationalists. And all of them are giddy over an American Netflix series. Normally, nothing worth paying attention to about this; it’s common practice in anglophone Canada.
But … but … the threat to Canada’s sovereignty has not magically disappeared, even though the aggression of the threats has moderated somewhat. So what does the future hold? Where Canada’s sovereignty is concerned, nothing pleasant if Canadians don’t change — and in a very radical way — their habits of cultural consumption.
However, people don’t like being told they SHOULD watch or read or listen to certain cultural works. It rankles, and seems scolding. That means that the producers of Canadian culture need to think in new ways.
A few years ago, I established a micro press called BridgeText. One of its ideas is that we need more novels that are experienced as movie scripts are.
More here: https://youtu.be/NALcaQ3QCYs?si=76rj7dAePOZRsZZT
And here: https://youtu.be/g40XxM8phDI?si=U690nbROcWeqZHth
Tous ces gens – chacun sans exception – se perçoivent comme des nationalistes canadiens. Et tous sont enthousiasmés par une série américaine sur Netflix. Normalement, rien d'intéressant à ce sujet ; c'est une pratique courante au Canada anglophone.
Mais… mais… la menace à la souveraineté du Canada n'a pas disparu comme par magie, même si son agressivité s'est quelque peu atténuée. Alors, que nous réserve l'avenir ? En ce qui concerne la souveraineté du Canada, rien de réjouissant si les Canadiens ne changent pas – et de manière très radicale – leurs habitudes de consommation culturelle.
Cependant, les gens n'aiment pas qu'on leur dise qu'ils DEVRAIENT regarder, lire ou écouter certaines œuvres culturelles. C'est critiquable et semble réprimandant. Cela signifie que les producteurs de culture canadienne doivent repenser leurs façons de penser.
Il y a quelques années, j'ai fondé une micro-édition appelée BridgeText. L'une de ses idées est que nous avons besoin de plus de romans qui se vivent comme des scénarios de films.
Plus ici : Nouveau futur littéraire?
https://youtu.be/9muSm6LScHE
Friday, April 11, 2025
Spring flowers and micro geographies
How the patterns of blooming flowers are affected by micro geographies #ecology #springflowers #진달래
https://youtube.com/shorts/94_akRRuGOM?feature=share
Saturday, April 05, 2025
Who is Mark Carney?
Who is Mark Carney? (Part one)
https://youtu.be/K5zIoHki1Kc
Saturday, March 29, 2025
Job cuts two
What will be the effect of massive job cuts in the US federal govt? What will be the repercussions of making large numbers of employees jobless?
Full video at YouTube: What will be the effect of massive job cuts in the US govt? Good employees jobless.
https://youtube.com/shorts/AXHiObm9gZs?feature=share
Friday, March 28, 2025
Job cuts
Monday, March 24, 2025
Mark Carney et al
Mark Carney, Mike Myers and what it means to be Canadian #markcarney #cdnpoli #canadianelection
https://youtube.com/shorts/t_yAFPqh99s?feature=share
Saturday, March 22, 2025
Fine dust
Air pollution in Korea: How bad is it? #airquality #microscopicfinedust #미세먼지
https://youtube.com/shorts/Tg9UOWcOze8?feature=share
Tuesday, March 18, 2025
Big temperature fluctuations in Korea
Big temperature fluctuations in S. Korea. How about where you live?
#springweather #temperaturedrop
https://youtube.com/shorts/
Full video at YouTube: MrRgdUc3Wrc?feature=share
Sunday, March 16, 2025
Spring flowers and climate
Spring flowers are blooming earlier these days. Why?
Full video at YouTube:
https://youtu.be/wqoTX9JunyM
Sunday, March 09, 2025
Development in Seoul
The Life Span of Apartments in Seoul. What development patterns tell us about wealth and income distribution.
#seoullife #gangbuk #apartmentlife #seoulhousing
Thursday, March 06, 2025
Trump Decimates America’s military industries
This is the pattern. Trump’s inability to maintain alliances and his complete obliviousness to what he’s doing raise questions about his reason.
More: he decimated his own military/industrial complex. He’s alienating entire political spectrum.
YouTube: youtu.be/TYg2I5GKey4
Wednesday, February 26, 2025
A Tale of Two Wintry Cities
A Tale of Two Wintry Cities: Indicators of Climate Change in Toronto and Seoul
#Toronto #seoul #climatechange
Full video at YouTube:
https://youtu.be/FlbbH-qM6Vo
How do you dress for winter?
How do you dress for winter? #outerwear #winterclothing #parka #toque #겨울옷 #vetements
https://youtube.com/shorts/GRJEW6RpWXM?feature=share
Friday, February 21, 2025
Qualities of Snow
What are the different qualities of snow?
#snowfall #snowquality #winter #canada #hokkaido #korea
Full video at YouTube:
https://youtube.com/shorts/Je0saSbPkSE?feature=share
Wednesday, February 19, 2025
Winter in Two Cities
Winter in two cities: Toronto and Seoul
#winterweather #canadianwinter #koreanwinter #한국겨울 #캐나다
Full video at YouTube:
https://youtube.com/shorts/SPNPyz1PPBQ?feature=share
Tuesday, February 18, 2025
Outtakes from The Business Army
Pages and artwork from two versions of my historical novel about an attempt to engineer a fascist coup in 1930s America.
The novel comes in two versions: as a conventional text-only manuscript, and as an illustrated screenplay novel with “storyboard roughs” and “stills” based on archival photos. I’ve seen (and, once, produced) a lot of graphic novels in my time. But I’ve never seen an approach like this. Not sure why. It’s an idea that borrows from the brilliance of whoever invented the original screenplay format, yet it avoids one of the biggest pitfalls of movie production: the incredible pressure to make a profit and recover production costs, and therefore make “crowd pleasing” fictions.
The novel itself is based on real people and events, and tells the story of General Smedley Butler — a Marine who became a vocal critic of militarism and American imperialism — and his cat and mouse relationship with Gerald MacGuire, a small time bond salesman all too willing to act as an agent for much more powerful individuals.
If curious, more here: https://www.eclectica.org/v23n2/harvor.html
Here: The Business Army, part one
https://youtu.be/g2stGjrxL1Y
And here: The Business Army- Part One A - sep 10 12
https://youtu.be/7etqXWttH_,
Sunday, February 16, 2025
Outtakes from Baram Writer
Outtakes from a Baram Writer project
The word baram is a transliteration of 바람, or wind.
The project started twelve years ago, with a very crude moviepoem rendered in MovieMaker on a wheezy second hand laptop. (If curious: Baram Writer
https://youtu.be/oPHzuqDuAec )
It’s been through several versions since then, the most recent here: Baram Writer (new version)
https://youtu.be/Oc9PS6vXd40 )
I’m trying to capture “fugitive sensations” in the project; the sorts of thoughts and emotions one has while walking with loved one in nature, and experiencing a mix of happiness and anxiety, the latter a recognized of the worlds “objective” — that is, savage — nature.
The photos and settings of this extended project are changing: the one in the foreground is a spot near Lake Ontario that has personal significance after the deaths of my brother, mother in law, father, maternal aunt, and mother. What is the connection between the living and the dead? Memory, obviously. But there seems to be something more too, and the austere seasons of autumn and winter connect rather directly to that something.
*
BARAM WRITER
EXT. SEOUL. WINTER. LATE AFTERNOON.
It’s a greyish day, and Mats feels a mixture of coldness and clammy, wet mildness through his clothing.
Then the temperature starts to drop…
Wind blows through trees, rustles dead leaves, makes branches sway in a creaking, slow dervish.
VO [male]: The wind has its own tone, its own feeling. It’s like … coldness, thinness.
It’s like hunger.
The wind has a body. The wind is someone.























