Friday, April 17, 2026

Pollution Wars

 


 #wargasm #warecology #militarism #militarypollution


The tremendous bravery of the Ukrainian people is stirring to see. But these types of conflicts increase significantly military budgets and therefore pollution, even after the fighting has stopped. Why not reduce military budgets drastically and therefore reduce the likelihood of these sorts of conflicts between in the first place? And if there are quite a few people who agree with this point of view, why doesn’t the topic trend more frequently on social media?


*

Pollution Wars 1 (https://youtu.be/t90a8DoIW3Q) is a short, non-videopoem piece by Finn Harvor, uploaded in early 2022. It functions more as a direct, essayistic or commentary-style video rather than one of his hybrid literary/experimental “authorial movies” or videopoems.


The video explicitly links industrialism, militarism, and environmental pollution. Harvor argues that wars and heightened military budgets dramatically increase pollution—not only during active conflict but long afterward through sustained defense spending, manufacturing, and ecological damage. He highlights the bravery of the Ukrainian people amid the ongoing invasion (contextual for 2022) but questions why societies don’t prioritize drastic reductions in military budgets to lower both conflict risks and environmental harm. 


The hashtags (#wargasm #warecology #militarism #militarypollution) tie it directly to his other works.

Visually and tonally, it appears straightforward and reflective, using footage or collage to underscore the industrial-military complex’s ecological footprint, without the fragmented phonetic poetry, narration-over-music layering, or satirical edge prominent in pieces like The Wargasm 2.

Contextualization with Harvor’s Other Video Poetry/Work


This piece extends the “warecology” and militarism critique central to The Wargasm 2 - new cut (and its source poem “nHI-lizm”). Where Wargasm 2 uses ironic, nihilistic language and collage to explore war’s perverse allure, desensitization, and absurdity (the “wargasm” thrill), Pollution Wars 1 grounds it in concrete environmental consequences—treating war as an accelerator of the Anthropocene’s industrial pollution crisis.


It aligns with Harvor’s broader themes of:

The intersection of technology, power structures, and planetary degradation.

How globalization, neoliberalism, and militarism shape everyday and ecological realities.


It complements more politically charged works like Peacedemic or Wargasm? (which weighs peace vs. perpetual war machinery) and contrasts with his quieter, observational pieces such as Deep Into Another Night or The Baram Poems series (lyrical engagements with weather, place, and subtle environmental shifts in South Korea).

In essence, Pollution Wars 1 acts as a straightforward ecological companion to the more artistic/satirical anti-war videopoems. It reinforces Harvor’s consistent concern with how human systems of violence and production erode both culture and the biosphere, presented here in a more advocacy-oriented format to provoke discussion on military spending and trending social priorities.


Thursday, April 16, 2026

The War on Smog, part two

 



The War on Smog, part two

https://youtu.be/bdQWvMQrs0A


This is a short experimental moviepoem (poetry film, ~1 minute) by Finn Harvor, part of his ongoing “The War on Smog” series. It highlights the environmental paradox of militarism: militaries are justified as protectors of nations and people, yet their operations are among the largest polluters on the planet, actively worsening the climate crisis and making the world less livable.

The piece confronts the irony of “immense defense budgets” causing a “slow, borderless catastrophe.” Key lines from the series (including this installment) include:

“The big planners / Are sure / Whatever they do / Is a form of tough minded / Solution….”

It questions whether militaries can “protect us from an unliveable planet” when their training, wars, fuel consumption, weapons production, and logistics emit massive amounts of greenhouse gases, create toxic pollution, and contribute to smog, wildfires, rising seas, and systemic environmental risk. The narration blends ironic corporate/military-speak with poetic critique, portraying “protection” as self-defeating.

Visual and Stylistic Elements

Consistent with Harvor’s ambient/authorial style (seen in his earlier works like Thievanomics and Meat: The Weapons Folks’ Buffet), it uses layered visuals paired with rhythmic music and text overlays to create a haunting, ironic tone. 


 #climateemergency, #ecopoetics, #futureofwar, and #artandactivism.

Spring

 


 Spring/ 봄/ printemps

Monday, April 06, 2026

Trump’s posts




 Donald Trump and the fallout, so to speak, from his crazy posts.

https://youtube.com/shorts/4aKoFNJ51mE?feature=share

Sunday, April 05, 2026

War or diplomacy?

 



 War or diplomacy? The choice for Europe and Asia regarding the war against Iran

https://youtube.com/shorts/QH6PH10ekX0?feature=share

Friday, April 03, 2026

Dangerous Donald


Trump remains as dangerous as ever. Why didn’t the Democrats prosecute him when they had the chance?

https://youtube.com/shorts/1-JrSRc-VQI?feature=share

Wednesday, April 01, 2026

진달래


 

More on Hormuz

 


“Go get your own oil!” The crisis in the Strait of Hormuz. How should other nations respond?

https://youtube.com/shorts/gQb_i0fIFoM?feature=share

Saturday, March 28, 2026

Strait Jacket: Hormuz and Political Fear


 The Independent:

Third, securing shipping would require a significant number of naval ships. Realistically, you’d need one or two naval ships per escort operation. A convoy any larger than that would be at increased risk of attack, unless the US and Israel have dramatically reduced Iran’s ability to target the ships.


And fourth, the military needs to think about the risk to its assets versus the benefits of opening the strait. A US warship has a crew of more than 200 personnel. Given Iran’s ability to hit ships with uncrewed surface vessels, drones and cruise missiles, is it worth putting those personnel at risk before you’ve reduced the threats from Iran’s coastline?


*


The US and Israel screwed up; the world’s economy is consequently suffering.


In particular, Trump highly sensitive to significant loses because of the devastating effect this would have on his domestic political support. More: Strait Jacket: Bringing Other Navies Into Hormuz 

https://youtu.be/fTEK_Ym-Ui4

Thursday, March 26, 2026

It’s all gonna crash

 


It’s All Gonna Crash

https://youtu.be/E2IKJXAF5pI

Sunday, March 22, 2026

Trump and the Democrats

 


 Trump is a danger to the world. Why isn’t the Democratic leadership doing more to organize protests?


#TrumpDanger

#DefendDemocracyNow

#WhereAreTheDems

#ActNowDemocrats

#DemLeadership

#StopAuthoritarianism

#DemocracyInPeril


Full video at YouTube: 

https://youtube.com/shorts/lXcd0JuWNlM?feature=share