Friday, October 11, 2013
New site, old site, new site
Am (once again) starting most of my posting here. Enough freebies for the corps.
Sunday, October 06, 2013
Morimura Tadushi
This is an image of Morimura Tadushi, the codename of Yoshikawa Takeo, the Japanese naval ensign posted to Hawaii to spy on America's Pacific Fleet in the months before the attack on Pearl Harbor. During that period, Yoshikawa rented small planes in which he flew over the harbor, went diving in waters close to the harbor, and observed activity generally from an apartment he had rented specifically because of its proximity to the area he wanted to see.
From the PLASTIC MILLENNIUM project.
From the PLASTIC MILLENNIUM project.
Friday, October 04, 2013
Plastic Millennium - historical backgrounder
images F. Harvor, 2013
These two images are of Prime Minister William Lyon Mackenzie King and Admiral Ernest King -- two lesser known but significant actors in the drama of World War Two. As both David Reynolds and Ian Kershaw have pointed out, the monumental war we remember began actually as two wars: one being fought between in Europe, and one fought in Asia. And while the European war broke out in September, 1939, the Asian war had been dragging of for some time, since it had its source in the meat-grinder of the imperial Japanese invasion of China, as well as ongoing guerrilla conflicts between Koreans and Japanese.
Furthermore, though the prime belligerents of Germany, France and Britain are well-known, several "lesser" actors were significant from the beginning; although Canadian troops were not active in the Battle of France (troops were sent overseas at that time, but only arrived in France as the French army was crumbling and the British Expeditionary Force was cut off at Dunkirk), supplies from Canada to the UK were an essential life-line across an Atlantic Ocean that was riddled with U-boats. Similarly, while conservative historians tend to make quick work of "Britain and her empire", the Treaty of Westminster had granted the ex-colonies of Canada, Australia and New Zealand sovereignty over foreign policy (something these nations did not possess during World War One).
As the war slowly dragged in the United States, it did not do so as an actual belligerent -- that is, as a military actor. This wasn't due to lack of concern; the U.S. started providing material support quite quickly, and, under the Roosevelt administration, was eager to do so. But political opinion in the U.S. was deeply divided between isolationists and internationalists. President Roosevelt -- who had spent his entire presidency fending off attacks from ultra-conservatives (including at least one coup attempt) -- needed to shore up public opinion if American was to enter what isolationist Charles Lindbergh labeled "Europe's war". Meanwhile, the Battle of the Atlantic was raging,with both Canadian and American convoys shipping food and materiel to Britain, and losing staggering numbers of vessels in the process. Admiral King was at the centre of this drama. Meanwhile, in Canada, Mackenzie King was fighting a political battle to garner support for the Canadian armed forces; Canada had almost been broken in two with the Conscription Crisis of World War One. Mackenzie King -- like Roosevelt, a cautious politician -- wanted to move with the flow of public opinion, and not in advance of it. The result was a war that unfolded by degrees, and not, as general perceptions have it, that exploded all at once.
Tuesday, October 01, 2013
Noteworthy
Business Insider journalist Michael Kelley on clandestine assassinations and Edward Snowden.
Sunday, September 29, 2013
Democracy Evolutions - 6
Part six of my Democracy Evolutions series is up at my new site:
When the great powers of Europe entered World War One, they believed the war would be short, and, of course, decided in their favour. But as the conflict dragged on, its costs escalated, and a new form of fear took hold among the banking centres of the continent and Britain. That fear was that the war would be so ruinously expensive that it would dismantle the imperial system the major European nations were so proud of having constructed....
cont'd
Saturday, September 28, 2013
Various
1. Brian Fawcett and Steven Beattie on the David Glimour flap.
2. The second interdisciplinary conference on the graphic novel at Oxford closes. Several interesting papers presented. I met several interesting people there, and learned quite a bit. More to follow.
3. Le Devoir reviews Jérôme Borromée, a title by first-time novelist Guillaume Borque. I haven't read the work, and am not likely to get access to it any time soon. (My favourite kind of book is printed ... and sold at a reasonable price at a second-hand shop (just for the record, I'm okay with e-books, but firmly within the ee-cheon won price range, with a slight preference for those priced unequivocally at "kong").)
The review of the novel describes it as being about a fairly archetypal urban male in his early 30s whose life is comfortable but who's in the grip of various dissatisfactions, some explicit, some concealed: he is worried about his sexual identity, and apparently shamed by rumours of his father's gayness. It sounds like an interesting and honest treatment of sexual anxieties that, while they come in an entire spectrum of forms, tend to be universal in the sense that one can only scrape away at the layers of this sort of anxiety -- one can never fully comprehend it. It is interesting to contrast the themes of this title with the David Gilmour's apparent opinion that "guy's guy" authors are strictly heterosexual; a leap of psychoanalytic faith.
Part of the problem is that while Gilmour is interested in the work of male writers who are fascinated with women (an interest that I share), he does very little to scrape away at the difficulties -- the possible projections, anxieties, wish fulfilments, and secret currents of self-loathing -- that are the flip-side of human sexuality's "directness". (Ironically, Gilmour the writer seems more in tune with this than Gilmour the interviewee.) In any event, it does seem to me that while Gilmour is currently being taken to task for alleged sexism, it might be more germane -- and more revealing -- to discuss his attitudes toward fellow Canadian writers ... a group he expresses obvious disdain for.
Of course, Canadian writing has never perceived itself as especially tough. But what is toughness? And does it deserve a conflation with guy's guy masculinity? I'd like to hear somewhat more on this issue -- both in terms of the interesting fiction that is currently being produced in Quebec (and getting little attention in anglo Canada), and in terms of Gilmour's more considered thoughts on this matter (he is fluently bilingual). It seems to me the question of his estimation of Canadian literature is where the controversy should really be sourced ... not the present brouhaha over his supposed sexism -- a sexism he himself denies, and which no evidence of has yet been produced.
2. The second interdisciplinary conference on the graphic novel at Oxford closes. Several interesting papers presented. I met several interesting people there, and learned quite a bit. More to follow.
3. Le Devoir reviews Jérôme Borromée, a title by first-time novelist Guillaume Borque. I haven't read the work, and am not likely to get access to it any time soon. (My favourite kind of book is printed ... and sold at a reasonable price at a second-hand shop (just for the record, I'm okay with e-books, but firmly within the ee-cheon won price range, with a slight preference for those priced unequivocally at "kong").)
The review of the novel describes it as being about a fairly archetypal urban male in his early 30s whose life is comfortable but who's in the grip of various dissatisfactions, some explicit, some concealed: he is worried about his sexual identity, and apparently shamed by rumours of his father's gayness. It sounds like an interesting and honest treatment of sexual anxieties that, while they come in an entire spectrum of forms, tend to be universal in the sense that one can only scrape away at the layers of this sort of anxiety -- one can never fully comprehend it. It is interesting to contrast the themes of this title with the David Gilmour's apparent opinion that "guy's guy" authors are strictly heterosexual; a leap of psychoanalytic faith.
Part of the problem is that while Gilmour is interested in the work of male writers who are fascinated with women (an interest that I share), he does very little to scrape away at the difficulties -- the possible projections, anxieties, wish fulfilments, and secret currents of self-loathing -- that are the flip-side of human sexuality's "directness". (Ironically, Gilmour the writer seems more in tune with this than Gilmour the interviewee.) In any event, it does seem to me that while Gilmour is currently being taken to task for alleged sexism, it might be more germane -- and more revealing -- to discuss his attitudes toward fellow Canadian writers ... a group he expresses obvious disdain for.
Of course, Canadian writing has never perceived itself as especially tough. But what is toughness? And does it deserve a conflation with guy's guy masculinity? I'd like to hear somewhat more on this issue -- both in terms of the interesting fiction that is currently being produced in Quebec (and getting little attention in anglo Canada), and in terms of Gilmour's more considered thoughts on this matter (he is fluently bilingual). It seems to me the question of his estimation of Canadian literature is where the controversy should really be sourced ... not the present brouhaha over his supposed sexism -- a sexism he himself denies, and which no evidence of has yet been produced.
Thursday, September 19, 2013
Saturday, September 07, 2013
John Harris - part two
2. Reports of declines in book sales have
become widespread. How bad are the declines? And do you think they are only a
cyclical phenomenon, or do they represent a permanent negative change for print
book sales?
The Economist, 17 Aug 2013, reported that total spending on books “is not likely
to rise.” But there is a shift in that e-book sales are rising and print-book
sales falling. Worldwide, e-books account for 14% of book sales. In America,
which serves also as a measure of over-all, first-world consumption, that
figure is 30%, and HarperCollins is figuring on an increase to 40% in three
years. According to this report, profits for publishers are “fatter” as
printing, distribution and storage costs go steadily down when sales of e-books
rise.
The implication is that publishers are
doing fine. The fact that profits from e-books are compensating for losses from
print-books suggests that, while overall book sales might be slipping, it is
not by much.
Likely, most literary writers would see the
Economist figures as irrelevant to them, because it’s conceivable that
overall sales of books could be stable while sales of literary books are in
free-fall. So far as I know, no one’s tried to collect figures on this,
possibly because you’d have to establish a definition of “literary.” You could
set up rough parameters by assuming that 90% of poetry books or collections of
literary criticism are literary, that only a small amount (say 5%) of “genre”
fiction (sci fi, romance, porn, western, mystery) is literary, and that a
certain percent of adventure-travel is literary etc, then track sales of novels,
memoirs, and books of poetry and essays since the advent of the web.
This might provide some insight into
whether the e-book phenomenon is giving a special advantage to crap novels over
literary ones. I myself doubt this is happening. I sense there’s a fixed ratio between
novels sold by Arnold Bennett and those sold by James Joyce that would apply to
paperback novels sold by Harlequin (over 100 million per year since the
mid-nineties, by Danielle Steel (800 million to date) and by Margaret Atwood
(?). That ratio likely applies to e-books too.
It may be that sales of literary books in
the schools are down, and school sales are a big factor for literary writers. Again,
I don’t think anyone’s collected any figures, but there’s been a shift in
schools towards Creative Writing exercises and courses, which require fewer
books and anthologies, and technical and journalistic (writing on public issue)
courses, which require none. The “English Department” in the schools, colleges
and universities is now teaching writing rather than writing through
literature. It may be too that fifty years of deconstructionist and
postmodernist attacks on the canon and questioning of the possibility of a
canon (i.e. of anthologies, class reading lists, courses on literary genres and
writers etc) has had an effect.
The Economist reports happier
authors as well as happier publishers: “Royalties from e-books are about 25% of
net receipts, compared with an average of around 16% in print. Careers can take
off faster.” The sole example given is E. L. James’s bondage-buster, Fifteen
Shades of Grey, which went from online to print. The book is part of a trilogy
that has sold 70 million copies, in paperback, to date.
Again, James’s experience might not seem
relevant to writers of literary novels — I haven’t read her so I don’t know how
she would be regarded. But she represents possibilities for literary writers if
they decide to approach e-book publishers or engage in self-publishing on the
web. It may be that, as the Economist implies, it’s easier (cheaper) to
advertise on the web as well as to publish. If you self-publish, you can with a
little practice and minimal expense create as attractive a product as any
mainline publisher. In print, this is impossible.
3.
What area of book publishing is suffering most? More specifically, are novel
sales suffering more than other kinds of books?
See #2. There’s no evidence that any area
of book publishing is in decline or that novel sales, specifically, are down.
Whether sales of “literary” books, including novels, is down depends on the
definition of “literary.”
4.
Are the declines linked to woes in the bricks-and-mortar retail sector, for
example, bankrupt/near-bankrupt independents and teetering book chains, or are
troubles in the retail trade the result, not the cause, of declining book sales?
Paul McNally’s article on this in Canadian
Notes and Queries 83 was a revelation to me. He was responding to CNQ’s
theme, “who killed CanLit?” His answer, based on his own experience running his
McNally-Robinson chain on the prairies, was that CanLit is “robust” and that small
brick-and-mortar stores can be profitable if they sell e-books as he does
(through Google’s Canadian e-bookstore) and serve as focal points for “regional
and literary [there’s that word again] books” that are self-published or
produced by small, local presses: “As a community institution, the independent
bookstore . . . has a lovely, serendipitous feel and sometimes, when the right
network of authors, friends, family, neighbors and colleagues gets together to
launch the book (and buy it), there’s a wonderful sense of work fulfilled and a
new beginning.”
In my own town, Prince George, we have a
small Coles in the mall and a fairly large independent downtown bookstore
called Books & Co. Books & Co. doesn’t sell e-books but is an outlet
for small-press books about the region or by local authors (from Caitlin Press,
Heritage, New Star, Repository, Gorse St. and Creekstone) or for a large array
of self-published books from students in the two creative writing courses (at
the college and the university) and from local writers. It has that feel that
McNally describes, augmented by the availability of food and coffee (Café
Voltaire) and by an endless series of musical events, plays, poetry readings,
and power-point presentations by photographers and travelers in the upstairs
theatre that can seat 100. Their website conveys the essence of what McNally is
talking about and allows customers to check events, arrange to put on their own
events, find out what books are in stock, participate in local causes (most
recently, to keep the print edition of the Globe and Mail coming into town)
etc.
Books and Co. also features a huge array of
remaindered books. I believe this feature has to do with the tax benefits
publishers receive when they get rid of their print runs. It’s also a great
service to readers. As often as not, I’m in the store to pick up books of
fairly fresh Canadian poetry (a weakness) for a dollar or two per copy.
Sunday, September 01, 2013
Fievre Globale II
Dans le village de ta naissance, les cigales et les chats sont en competition pour devenir l'essence de l'été.
Thursday, August 29, 2013
Friday, August 23, 2013
50
Yesterday would have been Richard's fiftieth birthday. The tradition in Asia is that one gathers with the deceased's family and friends and has dinner, as if for a normal birthday. In this case, that wasn't possible, so Suki and I went to the Buddhist temple near Kyungbukkong.
So now he's gone. It's still sinking in.
So now he's gone. It's still sinking in.
Wednesday, August 21, 2013
Fievre Globale - 1
Extérieur.
Une plage en Corée du Sud. Jour.
VO:
"Nous arrivons à Daejin en bus. Nous sommes seulement un ou
deux kilomètre de la DMZ. En venant ici, nous sommes passés l'une
base de l'armée après l'autre. Premierement, l'utilisation
militaire semble le principal moteur de l'économie locale....
«Au
Daejin, le terminal est si petite que dans un premier temps, il
semble déserte. Mais après nous orienter, nous trouvons notre
chemin vers la plage.
«C'est
beau - en forme de croissant, et, contrairement à plusieurs des
plages plus au sud le long de la côte, complètement rempli avec du
sable brun clair. Il est également – dans cet coin - à peu près
déserte. Loin de nous, un foule, proche des hotels cher.
Il
ya une barrière entre la route et la plage. Près de la section où
nous en sommes, il est enfilées avec du fil de fer barbelé, un
vestige de l'époque où cette région était muré de l'utilisation
civile...
"Maintenant,
la plage est ouverte ... mais les affaires n'est pas très bon. Quand
nous avons faim et voulons manger un morceau, nous constatons que de
localiser quelque chose d'aussi fondamental qu'un « supa "(un
dépanneur), nous avons besoin de marcher presque toute la distance
de la plage jusqu'a la région avec toutes les personnes et leurs
radeaux gonflables en multicolores, avec les têtes d'animaux et
facilement perforés.
«Retour
à notre place sur la plage, une sirène se déclenche alors. La voix
d'un homme soufflant dans le microphone, comme pour effacer la
poussière. Puis son avertissement brouillées: « Ne pas aller trop
loin dans l'eau avec vos trucs flottants »- ou quelque chose ... je
ne peux pas lui donner un sens, et tu dois faire de la traduction sur
la base d'un texte ébréché et incomplète.
«Plus
de temps à la plage. Première,un baignade dans l'eau salée froide.
Le choc de l'océan - le résidus saine et claire de la frigidité de
celui-ci. Dans l'été, sa étant tolérable. (Je pense à mon frère
pendant ses jours au Cap-Breton.)
"Ensuite,
la sirène de nouveau. Plus de soufflage dans le microphone et un
autre avertissement, celui-ci encore plus confus.
"Une
autre annoncement.
"Une
autre sirène.
«Je
m'adresse à toi. 이상한 아저씨,"
dis-je. Cet homme est du type bizarre.
"A
l'époque de la quatrième annonce de sirène, je commence à faire
mon propre.
«Fwee-wee-weeeeeeee.
Foof! Foof! 여러분! 자
들 야지! Wife 를 빨리
아나 줘!
Global Fevering is part of the Plastic Millennium project. It links to two screenplay module novels: a mega-novel (Plastic Millennium), and a conventional-length work (Paper Keys to Burning Kingdoms). Both these projects are complete and being shopped around to publishers and agents.
Global Fevering is an experimental online work-in-progress; it links the two former projects and occasionally quotes from them, while taking the narrative in new directions. It, too, is intended for eventual print publication. For now, however, it is digital, it is here, and it is free to read.
Copyright © 2013 Finn Harvor. All rights reserved.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)














